Showing posts with label biology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biology. Show all posts

Thursday, August 10, 2023

A DeepDive into BioAstronautics and Space with Ben Foehr

By Disha Divakar, San Marin High School


Whether it was as kids pretending cardboard boxes were space shuttles or being fascinated by Star Wars, spaceflight has been a dream for many! In reality, we often forget the factors that have to be thought through when sending a human to space and a lot of times we don't always know of the infinite mysteries and possibilities the galaxy holds! In this interview, Ben Foehr (
BS in Aerospace Engineering and Grad Student studying Human Spaceflight at CU Boulder) dives more into his work and emphasis on Bioastronautics and Aerospace engineering and addresses some questions as we enter a new age of space exploration! Ben presented Path to the Stars: Exploring Bioastronautics for the Marin Science Seminar on February 15th.

Fun Fact: He has worked on Cubesats, Sounding Rockets, and proprioceptive function research for astronauts

Ben Foehr


Right 
now, what is the most important question/problem that you are trying to answer and solve?
In my opinion, the biggest issues in Bioastronautics are the issues faced by Astronauts on long duration space flights. Space is an incredibly hostile environment even for short visits, but the longer we stay in outer space, the more our bodies are negatively affected. Extended microgravity leads to things like bone loss, muscle atrophy, and vision problems, while the constant noise and high stress environment found aboard spacecraft and space stations lead to most astronauts having really messed up sleep schedules for months on end, and having to fight through a bunch of different types of fatigue to get any work done. And that's just for Earth orbit: the further out we go towards places like the Moon or Mars, the more of an issue things like isolation from support and deadly radiation becomes, which is its own set of huge issues! So, overall, a lot of my field's focus is on figuring out how the heck we'll be able to keep all our astronauts happy, healthy, and productive when we start living in space for more than just a few weeks or months.

What particular factors do you consider when sending a human through space flight? How do you develop the right conditions for a human to travel in space for long periods of time?
For spaceflight, we start by considering all of the parts of our environment here on Earth we have to bring with us into space for our crew to survive: an atmosphere we can breathe, food we can eat, water we can drink (then recycle and drink again). We also have to think about less obvious parts of our everyday environment, like what tools and skills a crew will need to conduct their mission successfully, or what unexpected factors might make things more complex, like how we'd deal with a surprise medical emergency, or sudden tensions between the crew. Luckily, the best way to prepare for these missions is to look at previous missions: we've sent around 628 people to space so far, and while that a very small number of data points for most scientific studies, all of these previous explorers can tell us a lot about what worked on their mission and what didn't, so we can prepare for how we want to do things different next time. The ISS has been especially helpful, as crews staying abroad for 6 months or more will give a LOT of feedback about how they felt in terms of physical and mental health, their ability to get their job done, and what they would have liked to have during their stay to make things better.

What was the most influential project you have worked on?
So far, the most influential project I've ever worked on was a week-long design workshop hosted by the ESA and the University of Stuttgart out in Germany. There, I was one of only two Americans invited to work with a group of 40 other college students from all across the world who were interested in space exploration to design a realistic and workable concept for a space station that could be built some day in the near future. Obviously, designing a space station like this was incredibly cool and exciting, but in my opinion, working with an international group like this really opened my eyes to the different ways people all over the planet engage with space exploration, and I was able to make some lifelong friends in the process! It was a ton of work, and I didn't sleep much that week, but I came out of it more excited about my field than ever before.

Do you think it is going to be necessary for humans to relocate to a new planet soon? When do you think Earth’s conditions will become inhabitable/unsuitable for us?
This is a question I hear often, and I totally understand why a lot of people think leaving the Earth might be our only option. As climate change worsens and our planet begins to suffer from the effects of pollution, it often feels like fleeing to the stars and finding somewhere safe where we can survive might be our only chance to survive. But space is an incredibly inhospitable place, and keeping just two or three humans alive on places like the Moon or Mars even for a few days is a really, really difficult task, so with current technology it's basically impossible to strike out in search of a new home. But this doesn't mean we should give up hope: humans are incredibly resilient, and just the fact that we're even able to send people off-world for long periods of time is proof that we can adapt to harsh environments and overcome incredible problems! I think one day we will see humans living on another world, but, in my opinion, I think something like that will only ever be possible once we figure out how to fix our problems on Earth. But I believe in us, and think we will be able to pull it off! And after that, as they say, I think the sky's the limit!

Will space exploration start affecting everybody’s life and become a normality/reality for people other than astronauts?
I think space exploration already does affect everyone's life down on Earth, it's just hard to see sometimes. A lot of technology we use everyday like GPS, compact computers, Solar Panels, and even velcro was developed for space exploration, and current missions are helping innovate and create new and exciting technology. In terms of traveling to space, I also think that's something we'll see more and more of: right now it's fairly exclusively either rich tourists or highly selected scientists, which is generally out of reach for regular people. But as more nations and organizations travel out into space, more people will go too, and it would not surprise me that, within the next 100 years, we see space exploration more as people saw sailors on old exploring and trading ships: a rough lifestyle and still a fairly exclusive group, but something regular people could, with the commitment, become a part of. And beyond that, I one day hope that everyone can go to space as easily as going on any other trip, or moving to any other place on Earth!

What are your hopes for the future of space exploration? What do you want to see?
There is a lot I hope to one day see in regards to space exploration, but my number one dream would be to see us explore space and live on new worlds in a way that shows improvement for humanity beyond what we've done before. Back during the Cold War, for example, even though tensions were extremely high between the US and the Soviet Union, the joint Apollo/Soyuz mission in 1975 saw the two "opposing" crews quickly become fast friends, bonding over their shared humanity and love of exploration! In the future, I hope to see more events like this, where different people from different nations, creeds, and backgrounds can still explore space under common goals. I'd love to see, for example, international collaboration on Moon and Mars missions not just with NASA and ESA, but other space agencies like the Chinese National Space Administration, or the Indian Space Administration, or any other nation that wants to be a part of this journey. If we want to go to the Moon, Mars, or beyond, we need to go together, and I hope to one day see that become reality.

Friday, January 27, 2023

Designer Babies: Where Do We Draw the Line? Featuring Liya Rabkina

 Disha Divakar, San Marin High School

Dog breeding is a well-known process in which certain favorable traits and characteristics of dogs are chosen over others. Over time, people have realized that all dogs are valuable and just as amazing as others even if they come in different shapes and sizes. People have even acknowledged that this type of selective breeding results in unhealthy generations and leads to non-purebred dogs being looked down upon. Similar to this situation exists the developing process of preimplantation genetic testing, PGT for short, and the creation of what we call “Designer Babies”.  PGT testing is a developing platform that advances pregnancy opinions and tests for many different conditions. There are three types of PGT-testing: PGT-A to test for aneuploidies, PGT-M to test for monogenetic conditions, and PGT-P for polygenic conditions. It does, however, come with a fair share of ethical concerns.


Featured in this essay is the perspective of a genetic counselor, Liya Rabkina. Rabkina is a licensed and board-certified genetic counselor who is currently working at Igenomix USA in SFO. She holds a B.A. in Biochemistry from Scripps College and M.S. in Genetic Counseling from Northwestern. Through an interview and presentation, she provided insightful information regarding the science of designer babies and the ethics surrounding them.

PGT testing is a novel way to help struggling parents get a better look at their pregnancy. Sometimes families have an increased chance of passing on inherited diseases and conditions to their offspring that may threaten the baby’s life and the pregnancy itself. These can include Down Syndrome, Turner Syndrome, and Klinefelter syndrome.  PGT testing helps to test for such conditions. PGT is used in conjunction with in vitro fertilization (IVF) to keep the embryos with the highest chance of survival and the ones with the lowest risks of certain genetic diseases. PGT testing can also be used for the testing of risks of polygenic conditions such as diabetes. One might ask how ethical it is to simply discard embryos that only have a possibility of an inherited illness and may not even be life-threatening.

PGT-A is the more typically used form of PGT testing. PacGenomics, a clinical genetics laboratory, says,” PGT-A, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies, is a genetic test performed on embryos created through IVF to screen for chromosomal abnormalities.” PGT-A is specifically to screen for aneuploidies which are generally related to either an excess or loss of a chromosome. According to Igenomix, PGT-A testing helps decrease the chances of miscarriage, increase pregnancy rates, and provides a greater chance of successful implantation. The detection of these abnormalities helps parents exclude embryos with aneuploidy and keep those with the highest success rate. It is understandable how patients would desire an option like this after they struggle with pregnancy. While PGT-A testing may open doors for some, according to the Pacific Fertility Center of Los Angeles, “PGS/PGT-A testing is typically performed during the IVF procedure, which can cost anywhere from $10,000 to $30,000 without a third-party surrogate or egg donor.” Thinking about this, it is clear that the process is no piece of cake. IVF treatment itself is known to be quite long and expensive due to the number of cycles needed to have a successful embryo. So adding a new test, PGT-A, on top of this already complicated process, can add a lot more tension and stress to a family. Liya Rabkina also wishes that people understood the practicality of this process and success as “there are often far fewer embryos than couples are hoping to have available for transfer.”. Another idea to keep in mind is that PGT-A testing can also be used for sex selection which can present ethical and social problems discussed later. Nonetheless, PGT testing can provide IVF patients with a better shot at a viable pregnancy while some families may be left with a lack of resources and embryos!

Another common form of PGT testing is PGT-M which tests for monogenetic, single-gene diseases. This is generally done when families are aware of a specific genetic condition that spreads in the family and want to test for that specific gene in the embryos. Examples of single-gene diseases include cystic fibrosis, breast cancer, sickle cell anemia, and Huntington’s. These diseases are rare and potentially devastating so it is crucial for families to know how they can prepare themselves and possibly prevent these types of inherited conditions.

Both PGT-A and PGT-M show to test for life-threatening and drastic conditions and both are likely to be on the more immediate and life-long side. On the other hand, a more newly emerging technology known as the PGT-P test for polygenic conditions. This testing shows a possible risk that may develop over time. PGT-P tests for conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and asthma. Generally, as mentioned before, these are more of a risk and develop rather than immediately devastating or threatening the life of the child. While these conditions may still be harmful in the long run, it may be unethical to discard these embryos based off of a non-life-threatening risk. More importantly, these eggs are still viable as well which provides another consideration when it comes to discarding them due to the discovery of a future common risk.  Aside from health conditions, it can also test for polygenic traits which include height! This can be considered unnecessary when considering the viability and health of an embryo.

Focusing on ethics, many perspectives can be looked at. Even genetic counselors take the role to place checkpoints and make ethical considerations when offering these tests to ensure that they are truly needed. Rabkina stated, “My team screens all referrals and discusses ethical concerns with the ordering clinician. We may even reject a case if our ethics committee believes we should not move forward with testing. That being said, I also use my clinical judgment when I speak with patients, even for cases that pass our ethics evaluation and are approved by the ordering clinician. I provide patients with information that can help them make the decision that is best for their family.” This is because it is understood that discarding eggs simply based on possibly viable chromosomal conditions and perhaps sex has a chance of leading to unnecessary division and an imbalance in society. PGT-A and PGT-M both test for life-threatening conditions which a family may not be able to support and which could potentially risk the life of the offspring. Testing for these conditions truly helps IVF patients have a more successful pregnancy and outcome. But, the cost and time may outweigh these probabilities as IVF itself as discussed before is an extraneous process topped off with the costly PGT tool. On top of that, PGT-A testing opens doors for sex selection which in an extreme case, could cause society to regress in terms of sexism. Unlike the testing mentioned above, PGT-P testing shows several serious ethical concerns. Not only do these polygenic risks have a much lower effect on the embryo's viability, most of the conditions and traits it tests for are not life-threatening or immediate. They tend to be risks far into the future in cases like diabetes and heart disease and they can even be a trait that is irrelevant to the health of the child like height. Eliminating embryos that don’t pose the same drastic risks as aneuploidies and monogenic conditions, opens up the doors to marginalizing those with these common conditions.   Rabkina speaks on where she draws the line on ethical considerations saying,” I, personally, struggle when families use information that does not impact the health of their future baby for decision-making. 

Overall, PGT-A and PGT-M testing helps provide parents the chance at a successful pregnancy as it provides more viable eggs and a better chance at a healthier offspring. While this is important, it is also important to keep in mind the effects this may have on society. Testing like PGT-P on the other hand may eliminate healthy and perfectly viable embryos and lead to extreme unbalance in society especially when embryos are discarded based on traits such as height or sex, that do not affect the child’s health. It is important to understand the process and ethical considerations of this new biotechnology.





Works Cited

“Genetic Testing and Screening Services for Family Planning by Pacgenomics.” PacGenomics, 9 June 2023, pacgenomics.com/pgt/.

“PGT-A: Selecting Chromosomally Normal Embryos: Igenomix Me.” Middle East, www.igenomix.net/our-services/pgt-a-patients/. Accessed 1 Aug. 2023.

PGT-M & PGT-A: Loma Linda University Center for Fertility & IVF: Ca. Loma Linda University Center for Fertility & IVF. (2020, May 20). https://lomalindafertility.com/treatments/ivf/genetic-testing/pgt-m-pgt-a/

“Testing for Polygenic Disorders (PGT-P).” Virginia Center for Reproductive Medicine, 30 Nov. 2020, www.vcrmed.com/genetic-screening/testing-for-polygenic-disorders-pgt-p/.





Wednesday, November 30, 2022

Covid-19 and Long COVID: Rapidly Developing Therapies for a New Disease

 On November 30, 2022 Art Wallace presented studies and statistics on a new disease, Long  COVID.

Art Wallace, MD PHD
Art Wallace, MD PHD


Art Wallace introducing himself!
Art Wallace introducing himself!

He explained the problems with Covid variants and why Long COVID presents negative long term effects.
Explaining their research objectives!
Explaining their research objectives!


Learn more about Covid-19 and Long COVID at Marin Science Seminar!

Thursday, November 17, 2022

“Blinded by the Lack of Light: Genetics of Pigmentation and Eye Loss in Cave-dwelling Crustacean” - An Interview With Meredith Protas Ph.D. of Dominican University of California

 by Samantha Dvorin, Archie Williams High School 

Meredith Protas is an associate professor and MS Biological Sciences Director at Dominican University. Her lab investigates the evolution and genetics of cave-dwelling creatures like crustaceans. Previously, she did research at UC Berkeley on cave-dwelling crustaceans and studied the genetic basis of human eye disease at UCSF. She has a B.A. in biology from Pomona College and a Ph.D. in Genetics from Harvard. On Wednesday, November 16, 2022, Dr. Protas presented The Genetics Behind Eye Degeneration in Cave-dwelling Crustaceans at the Marin Science Seminar. We asked her some questions about what she does.

1. What made you interested in studying cave crustaceans and evolutionary biology in general?

I felt like there were a lot of interesting questions in cave biology and I wanted to understand how the same things (like eye loss and loss of pigment) happened in very different organisms.

 2. How are the cave-dwelling and surface-dwelling forms of the isopod crustacean different?

There are lots of things, but some examples include loss of eyes, loss of pigment, and longer antennae.

3. What is your favorite crustacean or cave-dwelling creature in general?

I like Proteus anguinus, which is a cave-dwelling salamander. It’s known for having an unusually long lifespan.

Proteus anguinus, also known as Olm

4. Since many animals lose traits they no longer need (like how many cave animals lose their eyes and pigment), are there any traits you think humans will lose as we continue to evolve?

That’s a good question- it’ll depend if losing something doesn’t cause some extra negative things from happening but also if there is an advantage to that loss. Also, it’ll depend if the loss gives humans a reproductive advantage.

5. What is hands-on field work like (ie. exploring caves and collecting samples)?

We don’t do much of this currently, but I have gone to caves to collect animals. Then we bring them to the lab and work with them there.

 6. What does a day in the lab with your Dominican University students look like?

We tend to do a lot of molecular work- PCR, DNA extraction, and gel electrophoresis.

Dr. Protas in the lab with a student

7. What advice would you give to young people interested in genetics and scientific research?

Find some interesting questions and see how you can be a part of answering them.

8. Are there any projects you are working on right now?

Yes, using some genomic techniques and also looking at variation present in the surface form.

Dr. Protas' Zoom Seminar

Learn More:

- https://works.bepress.com/meredith-protas/

- https://marinscienceseminar.com/blinded-by-the-lack-of-light/

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

The Genetics Behind Eye Degeneration in Cave-dwelling Crustaceans

 On November 16, 2022. Dr. Meredith Protas gave a presentation on zoom to share how genes and mutations are responsible for cave-specific characteristics in organisms!

Introduction to presentation.
Introduction to presentation.


Dr. Protas gave everyone opportunities to showcase their knowledge asking them driving questions!

Question- "How do unique characters evolve?"
Question- "How do unique characters evolve?"


We all learned a lot about cave animals and the traits that make them unique!

Cave Animals and their characteristics!
Cave Animals and their characteristics!

Dr. Protas explained how cave animals have no eyesight and are different colors compared to their terrestrial cousins.

What makes cave animals different?
What makes cave animals different?

Learn more about Cave-dwelling Crustaceans at Marin Science Seminar!

Wednesday, November 9, 2022

I'm a Botanist (and unfortunately I don't know why your succulent isn't flowering!)

 On November 9, 2022, Dr. Sarah Jacobs came to Terra Linda to share the field work and responsibilities of a Botanist.

Texas Indian Paintbrush
Texas Indian Paintbrush

Dr. Jacobs starts the presentation with a story of how she became a botanist.

Steps to becoming a botanist
Steps to becoming a botanist

Dr. Jacobs explains the role of a systematic botanist and museum scientist and how they collect data from the field to classify plants.

Systematic botany
Systematic botany

To learn more about Botany and the best parts of it visit Marin Science Seminar!

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

"When Parasites Kill" - An Interview With Stephanie Rasmussen, M.S.


By Rachael Metzger, Marin Science Seminar Intern 

Stephanie Rasmussen holds a Bachelor’s degree in Biochemistry and a Master’s degree in Biology from Dominican University of California and is coming to Marin Science Seminar Wednesday, October 18th, 2017 to speak about her research on malaria in Uganda.

Stephanie Rasmussen first became interested in biology as a high school student, but it was not until her freshman year of college that she learned what research was and thus realized her passion. Research sparked her fascination with lab work, which allowed her to test biological theories in a lab. Rasmussen decided to study biochemistry because she wanted to "have a deeper understanding of why different reactions happen inside cells to make them work correctly,” as well as to “help scientists, doctors, and other health professionals understand how and why different diseases make people sick.”

As a sophomore in college, Rasmussen worked in her graduate student advisor’s malaria lab. She volunteered in the lab all through her undergraduate years and continued to work in the lab after she graduated to get her Master’s degree in biology. Rasmussen’s passion is in studying human diseases; working in the malaria lab helped further her interest. Graduate school was when she started studying malaria parasites on location in Uganda. Rasmussen shares how this excited her, “I got to travel to a malaria endemic region, where I worked on parasites coming directly from malaria patients.”


Mosquitoes carry malaria (Source: scientistsagainstmalaria.net)

Today, Rasmussen’s lab works with people both in the USA and in Uganda. On the importance of teamwork she says, “I love all of my coworkers. Success in science is all about teamwork and collaboration.” She enjoys working with a diverse group of people that share similar interests and have a shared goal: reducing the malaria burden. She encourages anyone interested in pursuing biomedical research to make connections with those in the field, and to learn about the work they are doing. She emphasizes the importance of taking advantage of research opportunities in college, “The only way people can find out if they like it is to try it.”


-->
Stephanie Rasmussen is happy to answer any questions about research as a career at: Stephanie.rasmussen16@gmail.com

Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Integrative Biology - An Interview with Richelle Tanner

By Rachael Metzger, Marin Science Seminar Intern

Richelle Tanner, a PhD Candidate in UC Berkeley's Department of Integrative Biology, is bringing her extensive knowledge of how climate change affects neural plasticity and growth within the Eelgrass Sea Hare to Marin Science Seminar on SEPTEMBER 27th, 2017. Details here.

Richelle Tanner's passion for the ocean and its inhabitants was sparked at a young age through growing up in the coastal city of Seattle and spending her summers in Honolulu. Tanner stated that since she was young she "always enjoyed reading books about seashells and learning about the diverse array of animals in coral reefs and tide pools." This youthful exploration prompted her to search for a career within the area of her passion, leading to her studies in Integrative Biology. "Being a scientist, especially a field biologist, is a career of constant exploration and discovery," she expresses, "this is why I became interested, and why I am still passionate about my work."
Eelgrass Sea Hare (Source: NOAA.gov)

Scientific research is not Tanner's only passion. Since she was four years old, music has been an integral part of her life. She took music into college, gaining one of her undergraduate degrees in jazz studies. When asked how her two paths of studies connect she says, "Music has helped me stay creative in my ideas, develop leadership and teamwork skills, and given me an intense work ethic." She explains how she compares her research development process to that of an improvised jazz solo. "You have a framework of what you would like to accomplish, but you have to base your future actions on what has already occurred to compose a complete story." Tanner believes her two disciplines have led to a more well balanced approach in both fields.


As the name of this month's seminar reveals, "Not Your Mother's Genes: How Maternal and Developmental Plasticity Shift Climate Change Responses in the Eelgrass Sea Hare," Tanner has chosen a very specialized area to study. The Phyllaplysia Taylori, or Eelgrass Sea Hare, is an excellent subject to study in relation to climate change. Tanner tells us more about this important creature.

"Phyllaplysia taylori, or the eelgrass sea hare, is an important grazer in the eelgrass ecosystem that is so prevalent in San Francisco Bay. Since eelgrass is really important for biological, oceanographic, and human processes, it is a natural focus when we are considering future climatic scenarios. I came to this sea hare chiefly because I have a love of all things sea slugs and nudibranchs. They are brilliantly colored, have amazing defenses, and are just plain cool by my standards. It was important for me to find a sea slug playing a large role in an ecosystem that would be impacted by climate change so I could bridge my two fields of physiology and ecology to answer some questions about how the ecosystem would be impacted by future changes. As I progressed in my work, it became clear that this sea hare is a great way to study climate change because it is tough enough to withstand some pretty extreme environmental conditions. Pushing these animals to their limits can tell us a lot about what the future holds for the ecosystem they play such a large role in. Coupled with observations of their current role, we can paint a pretty complete picture of where we are on the spectrum within their limits and inform future climatic predictions for the eelgrass ecosystem."

As Tanner expresses above, field work is a large part of her job, and it is also her favorite. Although getting up at 3:30 am, "to put on an already-wet wetsuit to crawl through three feet of mud in the dark looking for tiny sea slugs," might be a lot of work and something to complain about, she emphasizes that getting to travel all over the world observing animals in their natural habitats, collecting data, and bringing samples home, is well worth it. She encourages those who wish to follow in her footsteps to keep exploring different kinds of research just as she explores with field work. She has never said no to a research opportunity, she accentuates how it has greatly impacted her own work, and she urges others to do the same. Tanner also recommends getting involved with other people who appreciate and have similar interests. She drives home that "Staying excited about what you do is key to accomplishing your goals."

Richelle Tanner is happy to answer any specific questions about how to become a scientist at: rtanner@berkeley.edu. Join us Wednesday, September 27th, 2017 at Marin Science Seminar.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

An Interview With Diara Spain, Ph.D

By Rachael Metzger, MSS Intern

Ocean acidification is an issue becoming apparent in the effects on both sea creatures and humans. Diara Spain, the Associate Professor of Biology at Dominican University, came to Marin Science Seminar to talk to us about her studies in marine invertebrates and the damage ocean acidification is causing them. 

To learn more about Diara Spain and what inspired her studies we conducted an interview:


1. How did you get interested in biology? Is there a time, event, 
or person in your life that inspired you to pursue the study?
I've always been interested in biology, really science in general. I grew up in rural North Carolina and as a kid it was expected that you'd spend most of your free time outside playing with your friends and pets.  One thing that sparked my interest in marine organisms were the summer vacations at the undeveloped beaches in North Carolina. 

2. Why did you specifically decide to focus on functional morphology, locomotion in echinoderms, and the mechanical properties of crustacean exoskeletons? How do studying these subjects help expand your view on the ocean and how humans are affecting it? 
The essence of functional morphology is "function from form", this gives us insight into how biological structures can actually work mechanically or physiologically. I find this compelling, especially when you consider marine invertebrates which have a wide array of morphological features. At first glance locomotion in sea cucumbers and properties of crustacean exoskeletons may seem to have little in common, but both topics are based on skeletal support systems which is my major interest. I've learned quite a bit about different marine habitats as well as how populations size and  species diversity has changed from my studies.

3. What is the most interesting study you have done to date?
I'd have to say my work on locomotion in echinoderms, specifically sea cucumbers. These are very unusual organisms and the average person may not know much about them, but when I describe them it never fails to amaze. My students enjoy watching the time-lapse videos, I actually gave a talk at the seminar several years ago titled "Life in the Slow Lane". My studies on crustaceans are just beginning but I fully expect some interesting stories in the future.

4. How do you hope the ocean will look in 20 years and what are some steps we can take to get there?
The oceans are important for the functioning of our global ecosystem as well as the global economy. I'd like to see a habitat that is healthier for animals (including humans)  to live, play and work. 

An example of a smaller step is decreasing the widespread use of disposable plastics while increasing the usage of recyclable/reusable materials. A much larger step is the approval of ocean friendly policies that support conservation and sustainability while restricting damage and pollutants. 

5. What is your advice to teens and young adults who want to help preserve our oceans and the creatures that live in it? 
The best advice is to become involved, this can be done at multiple levels from local and regional up to globally in a way you feel most comfortable. Every fall there is a International Coastal Cleanup Day, San Rafael's Volunteer Program coordinates people with specific sites locally. Volunteers and donations are also welcome at marine conservation organizations, some focus on a specific animal like sea turtles or dolphins while others focus on a issue such as ocean pollution or habitat restoration. 


Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Ocean Acidification: How the Ocean is Acidifying and Affecting the Organisms That Call it Home

By Zack Griggy, San Marin HS

             Pollution is a global problem. One way to find proof of this is to look to the seas. We all know that the oceans have suffered greatly from pollution, evidence of which can be seen almost anywhere, from areas suffering from oil spills to the huge cluster of garbage floating in the North Pacific Ocean. We also know that many aquatic species are dying and going extinct because of ocean pollution. However, oils spills and trash aren't the only causes. Another cause is ocean acidification, which is caused by air pollution.
             Ocean acidification begins with carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is an essential part of photosynthesis in plants. However, it is also a greenhouse gas, and carbon dioxide emissions have become a global problem. Carbon Dioxide is one of the main contributors to both global climate change and ocean acidification. Carbon dioxide is emitted in huge quantities around the world. Part of these emissions are absorbed by the oceans. This leads to chemical reactions within the oceans to form Carbonic Acid from carbonate and hydrogen ions, which are formed using CO2 absorbed by the oceans. Carbonic Acid is the main cause of ocean acidification. For the past 300 million years, the oceans have had a pH of 8.2, but recently since the industrial revolution, that pH has dropped to 8.1. Estimates say that the ocean acidity may drop by another 0.5 pH
            The effects of ocean acidification can be very harmful to marine ecosystems. Many marine organisms such as arthropods, coral, and plankton will be impacted by ocean acidification. These organisms use the process of calcification to create shells, exoskeletons, etc. Calcification relied on using two ions, carbonate and calcium ions. However, Carbonic Acid also uses carbonate ions, which makes it more difficult for the aforementioned organisms to make their exoskeletons or shells. In addition, when more carbon is absorbed by the oceans, hydrogen ions become more abundant, which makes it increasingly more difficult for the organisms to make their exoskeletons.

Sources:
1. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/acidity.html
2. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/news/150203-Ocean-Acid.html
3. http://www.co2science.org/subject/c/summaries/calcification.php
4. http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Ocean+Acidification
5. http://hilo.hawaii.edu/academics/hohonu/documents/Vol09x06OceanAcidification.pdf

Interview with Irfan Kathiriya: How to Make or Break Your Heart

By: Sahiti Namburu School: Terra Linda High School Dr. Kathiriya is a pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist and Professor of Anesthesia at t...

About Us

Marin Science Seminar is a one-hour science lecture/presentation with a question and answer period open to all interested local teenagers, educators and community. Seminar sessions are held 12 Wednesday evenings during the school year, from 7:30 to 8:30 pm in the Innovation Hub at Terra Linda High School, 320 Nova Albion Way, San Rafael. Seminar speakers are scientists, mathematicians, engineers, physicians, technologists and computer programmers. The topics presented are in a specific area of the speaker’s expertise, geared to interested high school students.